Emails Prove Hillary 'Terror' Lie in Benghazi

WND

WASHINGTON – State Department emails released through a lawsuit by Judicial Watch show then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knew while the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi was under way that it was being carried out by terrorists.

Clinton blamed the attack on “rage and violence over an awful Internet video” when she spoke at a ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base on Sept. 14, 2014, as the remains of the four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, were returned to the United States.
The emails were made public Thursday by the Washington, D.C., legal watchdog group.
“These emails leave no doubt that Hillary Clinton’s closest advisers knew the truth about the Benghazi attack from almost the moment it happened,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
“And it is inescapable that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knowingly lied when she planted the false story about ‘inflammatory’ material being posted on the Internet,’” Fitton said.
He said the “contempt for the public’s right to know is evidenced not only in these documents, but also in the fact that we had to file a lawsuit in federal court to obtain them.”
“The Obama gang’s cover-up continues to unravel, despite its unlawful secrecy and continued slow-rolling of information,” Fitton said. “Congress, if it ever decides to do its job, cannot act soon enough to put Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills and every other official in these emails under oath.”
Fitton criticized the current House Select Committee investigation on Benghazi headed by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R- S.C.
“Never once has Gowdy or the House Select Committee asked Judicial Watch to turn over the many bombshell documents Judicial Watch has obtained from the Obama administration by FOIA request, “ Fitton told WND.
“I would have thought a serious congressional investigation into Benghazi would have started with the documents we had, since Judicial Watch has led in exposing the White House cover-up,” he said.
On Sept. 11, 2012, at 4:07 p.m. EST, as the Benghazi attack was going on, Maria Sand, then a special assistant to Clinton, forwarded an email from the State Department’s Operations Center titled, “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi is Under Attack,” to Cheryl Mills, then chief-of staff to Secretary Clinton, as well as Jacob Sullivan, then-deputy chief-of-staff for policy, Joseph McManus, then-Hillary Clinton’s executive assistant, and other special assistants in Clinton’s office.
The email read:

The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack. Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM [Chief of Mission] personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support.

Then, at 4:38 p.m. Eastern, State Department Foreign Service Officer Lawrence Randolph forwarded Mills, Sullivan and McManus an email from Scott Bultrowicz, the former director of the Diplomatic Security Service, one of four senior State Department officials who was ousted in December 2012 after the publication of the State Department’s Advisor Review Board final report of the Benghazi attack.
With the subject line “Attack on Benghazi,” it read:

DSCC [Diplomatic Security Command Center] received a phone call from [REDACTED] in Benghazi, Libya initially stating that 15 armed individuals were attacking the compound and trying to gain entrance. The Ambassador is present in Benghazi and currently is barricaded within the compound. There are no injuries at this time and it is unknown what the intent of the attackers is. At approximately 1600 DSCC received word from Benghazi that individuals had entered the compound. At 1614 RSO advised the Libyans had set fire to various buildings in the area, possibly the building that houses the Ambassador [REDACTED] is responding and taking fire.

Nearly seven hours later, at 12:04 a.m. on Sept. 12, Randolph sent an email with the subject line “FW: Update 3: Benghazi Shelter Location “Also Under Attack,” to Mills, Sullivan and McManus that had several updates about the Benghazi attack:

I just called Ops and they said the DS command center is reporting that the compound is under attack again. I am about to reach out to the DS Command Center.

The email also contains a chain of earlier email updates:

Sept. 11, 2012, at 11:57 p.m. EST. Email: “(SBU) DS Command reports the current shelter location for COM personnel in Benghazi is under mortar fire. There are reports of injuries to COM staff.”
Sept. 11, 2012, 6:06 p.m. EST. (Subject: “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU): “(SBU) Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and call for an attack on Embassy Tripoli”
Sept. 11, 2012, 4:54 p.m. EST: “Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site to locate COM personnel.”

The State Department emails released Thursday by Judicial Watch reveal the first official confirmation of the death of Ambassador Stevens.
On Sept. 12, 2012, at 3:22 a.m. EST, Senior Watch Officer Andrew Veprek forwarded an email to numerous State Department officials, which was later forwarded to Mills and McManus, with the subject line “Death of Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi.”
It read:

Embassy Tripoli confirms the death of Ambassador John C. (Chris) Stevens in Benghazi. His body has been recovered and is at the airport in Benghazi.

Two hours later, McManus forwarded the news of Ambassador Stevens’ death to officials in the State Department Legislative Affairs office with instructions not to “forward to anyone at this point.”
Despite her three top staff members being informed that a terrorist group had claimed credit for the attack, Clinton, issued an official statement, also produced to Judicial Watch, claiming the attack may have been “a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”

Boko Haram Becoming the 'Islamic State' of Africa?

"They could become the ISIS of Africa.  Boko Haram has continually praised ISIS' apocalyptic Islamic ideology.  But increasingly, U.S. counterintelligence officials fear a possible tactical and operational alliance between the two groups as well.  If that happens, it could give radical Islam an even bigger and growing foothold in both the Middle East and Africa."

The Christian Broadcasting Network

Coming Soon: Full-Body Transplants, But Is Your Soul Included?

21stcenturywire

Medical science continues to push the envelope of advancement, and is currently taking some startling new turns…

“Lucy” : A Movie About Luciferian Philosophy

While I agree with the article obviously, there are two points that I want to make. 
 First, the movie is replete with evolutionary teaching throughout and would leave most any person to believe that lie, one of Lucifer's grandest to blind the eyes of humanity to the reality of their Creator. If you have never questioned this "theory", you may want to put on your thinking cap and check this out.
Second, the articles refers to Lucy of evolutionary fame holding up her fossil remains as possibly the missing link.  This Lucy has many problems to be considered, and not deceived. If you want more on that, go here. 

VC

Luc Besson’s Lucy is a movie about a woman who unlocked the full, 100% potential of her brain power instead of the 10% humans reportedly use. While many viewers were confused by the movie’s odd mix of pseudo-science and action scenes, the core of the movie lies in a whole other realm: It is about the Luciferian philosophy of the occult elite and its futuristic pendant, transhumanism.

Transhumanism : Memories Could Soon be 'Uploaded' or 'Implanted' into Your Brain

Let me add what was previously have stated in an article entitled, "Predictions Of A Very Transhuman future by 2030:   
 
We are much further along the transhumanism trail than most would ever dream, perhaps very close to what is known as " The Singularity".  What is that you ask?  According to the Singularity Institute: 
 
"The Singularity is the technological creation of smarter-than-human intelligence. There are several technologies that are often mentioned as heading in this direction. The most commonly mentioned is probably Artificial Intelligence, but there are others: direct brain-computer interfaces, biological augmentation of the brain, genetic engineering, ultra-high-resolution scans of the brain followed by computer emulation. Some of these technologies seem likely to arrive much earlier than the others, but there are nonetheless several independent technologies all heading in the direction of the Singularity – several different technologies which, if they reached a threshold level of sophistication, would enable the creation of smarter-than-human intelligence."

ISIS Sleeper Cells in US Ready to Attack

Obama just wants to call them "extremists".  Or perhaps, "radicals" or a few other non descriptive names, certainly not Muslims. And they are on our soil, and in our neighborhoods right now... a percentage of them want to kill us, and are training to that very end.  -W.E.

CleanTVcom

Israel Rips U.S. Deal with 'Messianic, Apocalyptic' Iran

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

WND

The emerging U.S.-led deal that would allow Iran to enrich uranium at a limited rate, with the restrictions easing over time, poses a “great danger” to the Western world and Israel from a “messianic, apocalyptic” nation, Israel’s defense minister declared Monday.

Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon made the comments as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, against the wishes of President Obama, prepares for a trip to Washington next week to explain in an address to both houses of Congress why he is against the negotiations.
As WND reported, the prime minister’s aides have claimed Israel was being left out of the information loop regarding the talks. Their claims were supported by a European official who told the New York Times that U.S. negotiator Wendy Sherman warned him not to share information with the Israelis because “the details could be twisted to undermine a deal.” Since then, Obama administration officials have acknowledged the limiting of information-sharing with Israel.
Currently, negotiators are discussing a compromise of allowing 6,500 centrifuges with strict controls in place for 10 years and a gradual lifting over five years, the Associated Press reported.
The easing could bring the number of centrifuges back up to the current 10,000, the news wire reported.
But Israel contends the impending deal leaves the door open for Iran to covertly gain nuclear-weapons capacity, because the final stages of uranium enrichment needed to create fuel for a weapon can be done in small spaces that can be easily hidden.
Yaalon said an agreement of this kind signed between “the West and this messianic, apocalyptic regime” will “allow Iran to turn into a nuclear threshold state and continue its terror actions.”
A former army chief of staff, Yaalon vowed “we will not compromise on the security of the citizens of Israel and will act in every way, and speak from any stage, about the coming dangers.”
Netanyahu on Friday said he was “astonished” that the Obama administration continues diplomatic talks with Tehran after the International Atomic Energy Agency acknowledged again in its latest report that Iran is likely building a nuclear bomb.
“It is astonishing that even after the recent report determined that Iran is continuing to hide the military components of its nuclear program, the nuclear talks are with it are proceeding,” Netanyahu said at his weekly cabinet meeting. “Not only are they continuing, there is an increased effort to reach a nuclear agreement in the coming days and weeks.”
Boycott
Some Democratic members of Congress have said they will boycott Netanyahu’s March 3 speech, and the Obama administration has already said the president will not meet with him, insisting it would be inappropriate so close to Israel’s March 17 elections.
Meanwhile, in a column for his “progressive” Tikkun Magazine published by the Huffington Post, Rabbi Michael Lerner claimed American Jews are asking their non-Jewish neighbors to stand with them against Netanyahu and solicited funds for a full-page New York Times ad to “get our message to the decision makers.”
Lerner charged Netanyahu “wants to drag the US into a proxy war for Israel against Iran, and Jews are likely to get the blame when that war turns out be an even bigger disaster than the US war in Iraq.”
“We need our non-Jewish neighbors to help us get out the message that Netanyahu does not speak for us and his policies are actually the opposite of what most American Jews support,” Lerner wrote.
But Jeffrey Epstein, president of the non-profit America’s Truth Forum, rejected Lerner’s premise that he speaks for American Jews and charged in an open letter that the rabbi has “crossed the line by attempting to derail Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Congressionally-sanctioned opportunity to address the American People.”
In his letter, Epstein noted he was raised in a community of Jewish Holocaust survivors in the U.S. Northeast and leads an organization that aims to educate Americans regarding “the radical Islamic threat to world peace and national security.”
“The majority of informed Americans view Israel as the ‘canary in our coalmine’ and share his concerns over growing existential threats against the United States, Israel, thousands of Jews residing in the Diaspora and millions of innocent Christians in Muslim lands,” Epstein wrote.

HEY, OBAMA! ISIS is on the Run Again…Preparing to Invade Lebanon and KILL all the Christians

BareNakedIslam

Islamic State militants are planning to extend their positions to Lebanon and declare an ‘Islamic emirate there, Lebanese media says. ISIS jihadists are also planning suicide bombings in Beirut, according to the report.

RT  ISIS militants are “preparing military plans to declare an Islamic emirate in Lebanon very soon,” security sources told Lebanon’s Daily Star. The report added that the jihadists are preparing to establish a military committee that will oversee “Lebanese affairs” while “considering Lebanon as part of its state.” In June 2014, the militants’ chief – Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi – declared captured territories from Iraq’s Diyala province to Syria’s Aleppo an Islamic State ‘caliphate.’

IS fighters are demanding the militants in northern Syria to support them in the invasion of territories in neighboring Lebanon, the report stated. Unnamed security sources told the Lebanese paper that the arrangements to form an ISIS command for the Lebanon emirate are being supervised by Syrian militant Khalaf al-Zeyabi Halous, codenamed ‘Abu Musaab Halous,’ who played a key role in the IS offensive to capture the northern Raqqa province in 2013.

The report also revealed that an influential party in Lebanon received information that the jihadists have been actively recruiting suicide bombers to “target Shiite gatherings in Beirut and the southern suburbs, as well as French and Western interests.” It added that the Iranian embassy in Beirut is particularly vulnerable to an assault.

ISIS has already beheaded some Lebanese soldiers

The Iranian embassy was previously targeted by extremists in November 2013. The suicide bombing resulted in 23 deaths and at least 160 injuries.

In addition to government forces, Lebanese Christians have been arming themselves to defend their land and families from the jihadists.

James O’Keefe: “I Am Afraid for My Life”

Perhaps it has simply crashed due to high volume, but at this very moment, James O'Keefe's website, www.projectveritas.com, is offline.   -W.E.

InfoWars

Conservative filmmaker James O’Keefe is about to release a bombshell story that has the journalist fearing for his life.

We have a story we’re going to release this coming week and I've never thought about this before but I am afraid for my life on this one.
— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) February 21, 2015

“We have a story we’re going to release this coming week and I’ve never thought about this before but I am afraid for my life on this one,” O’Keefe tweeted on Saturday.

Whatever its nature, the story promises to be a big one given the impact generated by O’Keefe’s previous work.

In 2007, O’Keefe posed as a donor wanting to give money to Planned Parenthood to pay for the abortion of black and other minority babies. Workers at numerous Planned Parenthood clinics agreed to accept the donation on these terms.

O’Keefe’s biggest scalp was undoubtedly his 2009 take down of ACORN, an advocacy organization for people on low income. Hidden camera footage published by O’Keefe showed ACORN employees giving advice on how to evade detection for tax evasion, human smuggling and child prostitution. Congress voted to eliminate federal funding for ACORN as a result of the exposé.

In August 2014, O’Keefe demonstrated the porous state of the U.S. border when he crossed an unguarded footbridge in the upper Rio Grande while dressed as Osama Bin Laden.

For O’Keefe’s sake, let’s hope that he doesn’t end up like Andrew Breitbart, the conservative journalist who weeks before his untimely death on March 1, 2012 promised to release devastating video footage of President Obama.

“Wait til they see what happens March 1st,” Breitbart told an audience in Washington DC on February 9th.

The footage was subsequently released, but “fell flat” according to some critics. The video showed Obama at a rally with Professor Derrick Bell, a radical described by Breitbart.com editor-in-chief Joel Pollak as the “Jeremiah Wright of academia.”

What do you think O’Keefe’s bombshell story could be about? Let us know in the comments below.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

43% of Democrats Believe Obama Should Have Right to Ignore the Courts

GodfatherPolitics

Liberals have attacked Chief Justice Roy Moore for standing his ground against federal encroachment on the state of Alabama. Moore has made a constitutional case for his stand based on the fact that the federal constitution does not mention marriage, and what the Constitution does not mention, the courts have no right to regulate. 

In addition, the Tenth Amendment makes it clear that powers not enumerated in Constitution remain with the states:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”

Finally, marriage is a God-defined ordinance that should be protected and guarded by the civil magistrates.
Moore is arguing constitutionally. He’s following the law as it is written. He’s functioning as a duly elected judicial representative of the state of Alabama that voted overwhelmingly (81%) to forbid same-sex marriage.
Read more: “Alabama Governor Says He Would ‘Never . . . Disobey a Federal Court Ruling”
Now we learn that a good percent of “likely voters . . . think that the President should have the right to ignore court rulings if they stand in the way of actions he feels are ‘important.’” The numbers are higher when only Democrats are factored in:

“The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 26% of Likely U.S. Voters think the president should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if they are standing in the way of actions he feels are important for the country…

“But perhaps more unsettling to supporters of constitutional checks and balances is the finding that 43% of Democrats believe the president should have the right to ignore the courts. Only 35% of voters in President Obama’s party disagree, compared to 81% of Republicans and 67% of voters not affiliated with either major party…

“[W]hile 72% of GOP voters and 63% of unaffiliateds believe it is more important to preserve our constitutional system of checks and balances than for the federal government to operate efficiently, Democrats are evenly divided…

“Women and younger voters feel more strongly than men and those 40 and older that the president should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. Black voters believe that more than whites and other minority voters do.”

While Roy Moore is following the law as written, a majority of Democrats have not offered a single constitutional justification for a president to ignore the decisions of the courts.
As long as their president is implementing their goals, they have happy with his unilateral executive decisions.
It’s not enough to argue that “president should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if they are standing in the way of actions he feels are important for the country.” Adolf Hitler, Fidel Castro, and Josef Stalin believed that their actions were important for their country. Once in power, dictators can eliminate any checks and balances that were put into place in order to dilute the authority of a president. He can do this based on the operating premise that they would inhibit him from doing what he believes is best for the country.
Read more: “Southern Baptist Leader Says Roy Moore Should Comply with Judge’s Order or Resign”
The reason written constitutions were implemented was so the whims and fancies of political leaders would be stopped. As Raoul Berger has written:

“Fearful of the greedy lust for ever more power, the Founders resorted to a written Constitution in order, Chief Justice Marshall stated, to ‘define and limit’ the power they delegated, reflected in Jefferson’s urgent admonition to bind the delegates ‘down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.’ If it was to serve its purpose, the Constitution had to be ‘fixed,’ unalterable save by amendment, the more so because it expressed the consent of the people, who chose ‘to be governed,’ in the words of a prominent Founder, James Iredell, ‘under such and such principles. They have not chosen to be governed or promised to submit upon any other.’”[1]

Beginning of Sorrows: 27 Earthquakes in Last 24 Hours: Fireball Over Florida

 

Earthquakes in diverse places. 

Signs in sun and moon and stars, and on the earth dismay among nations. 

Nations rising against nations.   

The bible says, "all these are the beginning of sorrows".  
Paul Begley

Huge Fireball over Florida and seen in Georgia... also a powerful 6.2 earthquake hits Mexico and John McCain is ashamed of his country and his President and himself over Russia and Ukraine http://www.paulbegleyprophecy.com also http://strangesounds.org/2015/02/huge... also http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquake...
 

Mark of the Beast : Swedish Company Implants Class II RFID Microchips in Employees

"Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand."  -Daniel 12:12 
This is how it begins.  Not forced, but the people are presented some new and seemingly exciting technology...to help you medically, socially, etc. and with many practical applications.  And of course, it is being presented already as something cool.   At the same time, the people of the earth are being conditioned to technology that is surely leading up to the Mark.
Later, for those who don't cry for it, for those who aren't dying to receive it, they will be forced to take it.
Revelation puts it this way:

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."  -Revelation 13:16-18

GOD'S ETERNAL PURPOSE

Berean Bible Society
 -Pastor C. Stam


Have you ever considered carefully the opening words of the Bible? “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” Why doesn’t it simply say that God created the Universe? Why the heaven and the earth?

The Real Threat to Europe

There has been collaboration between European governments and terrorist organizations in cynical deals, supposedly to prevent attacks on European soil, writes Bassam Tawil. What will France and Europe receive in return for their stupidity, apart from the perpetually broken promise of "no further attacks"? Pictured above, one of the Kouachi brothers murders a wounded policeman outside the office of Charlie Hebdo in Paris, on 7 January 2014.

by Bassam Tawil
February 19, 2015 at 5:00 am

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5228/islamist-threat-europe

Commentators in Europe voicing opinions on the terrorist attacks at Charlie Hebdo and the kosher supermarket in Paris, reverentially discussed the motivation of the terrorists, but showed distressingly little understanding of the meaning of jihad.

Europe, hedonist and dishonest, is apparently willing to cut a deal with any violent dictator, including the most potentially violent: a nuclear-threshold Iran.
To understand the fate awaiting Europe, it is necessary to listen seriously to what the upper echelons of Islam say to each other about their intentions -- in Arabic.

These messages are quite different from those on Western television. What they say to each other is that the mission of Islam is to lead the whole world and eradicate all other religions, as they have been made irrelevant by the Qur'an.

Charlie Hebdo's cover after the attacks illustrates the very weakness exploited by the Islamists. The cover shown Muhammad, with a tear, aligning himself with humanism. To every Muslim on the planet, it shouted France's weakness, its increasing surrender to the Islamist threat, and the growing strength of Islam.

The real threat to Europe does not come from local Muslims who went to fight in the ranks of ISIS. The real threat comes from Muslims already in the enclaves in Europe. Their doctrine appears openly and without reservation, in books and on websites. It is spread in local languages in mosques by the imams in their communities. These communities command immigration; then the forming of enclaves in the host country, then the eventual violent takeover of the host.

The late Libyan leader, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, predicted that Islam would conquer Europe without even firing a shot. To understand and explain the fate awaiting Europe, it is necessary to listen seriously to what the upper echelons of Islam say to each about their own intentions -- in Arabic. These messages are quite different from those on Western television. What they say to one another is that the mission of Islam is to lead the whole world and eradicate all other religions, as they have been made irrelevant by the Qur'an.
Their doctrine appears openly and without reservation in books and on websites. It is spread in local languages in mosques by the imams in their communities throughout Europe. These communities operate according to an ancient Islamic code: They command immigration; then the forming of enclaves in the host country, then the eventual violent takeover of the host.
Once this process is complete, all the Islamic communities will unite to form the Islamic Caliphate. It will have no borders and no other identity. Then there will be Peace. This, they say, was the state of affairs under Muhammad and this will be the state of affairs in the future.
It is markedly apparent to us, however, that the world refuses to listen to what the Islamists are saying. Anyone who dares to issue a warning is called, among other names, an alarmist or a racist.
On the rare occasion when an expert does warn of the coming danger, the global media turn him into an object of scorn and derision. There seems to be less than no wish even to look at Islamist ideology. Al Jazeera, run by the Emir of Qatar to promote radical Islam, has instructed its American division not to use the words "terrorist," "militant," "extremist," "jihad" and "Islamist." Does anyone seriously think they are doing that to promote transparency?
Throughout history, society has disregarded -- and often even persecuted -- any messenger who says things it does not like, such as Giordano Bruno, burned at the stake in 1600 for wounding the world's narcissism by proposing that stars were other suns that could have other planets. Recently, global terrorism expert Steven Emerson, who made the 1994 documentary "Terrorists Amongst Us: Jihad in America," about the dangers the U.S. would face from radical Islam, has been vilified and ridiculed for an exaggerated comment about Birmingham. His apology may have reflected an error about the facts, but his central message was right. It did not negate his warning about the future danger these Muslim enclaves will present to Europe. Paris is not the only city with areas off-limits to police. Every tourist who goes to Marseilles, Köln, Berlin and Frankfurt is warned by local inhabitants about places to be bypassed.
The same is true of Stephen Coughlin, who was a Major in a Military Intelligence unit of the U.S. Army. Asked, as a lawyer, to prepare a report on Islamic sharia law, he delivered, in July 2007, the most meticulous, painstaking, thoroughly-documented report: "To Our Great Detriment": Ignoring What Extremists Say about Jihad." He was promptly fired. He had apparently come up with the "wrong" answer. The U.S. Army, it seems, had expected to hear that sharia law was not much different from the Magna Carta.
Commentators in Europe all had opinions about the terrorist attacks at the Charlie Hebdo office and the kosher supermarket in Paris. They reverentially discussed the motivation of the terrorists, the anti-Muslim atmosphere in Europe and concern over additional global jihad attacks, but showed distressingly little understanding of the meaning of jihad. If jihad is an inner struggle, and the people who practice it are mujahideen, there are a dizzying number of bloodthirsty, cut-throat, knife-wielding men out there waging inner struggle.
Charlie Hebdo's cover after the attack illustrates the very weakness of Europe that is exploited by the Islamists. The cover shows Muhammad, with a tear, aligning himself with European humanism. To every Muslim on the planet, it shouted France's weakness, its increasing surrender to the Islamist threat, and the growing strength of Islam. The real threat to Europe does not come from local Muslims who went to fight in the ranks of ISIS and have already been returning. The real threat comes from the Muslims already in their enclaves in Europe, who are about to attack their host countries. They have seen that their riots, arson, vandalism and robberies result in frightening away the Westerners, the fire department and the police. Last New Year's Eve alone in France, "only" 940 cars were torched – down, the French Interior Ministry proudly announced, from 1,067 the year before.
This tendency -- either to kill the messenger or scorn him -- also often results in blaming the victim. The Jews must have "done something," the notion goes, for the Nazis to want to exterminate all of them; they "should have fought back," and "it must have been their own fault."
Radical Islamists assure the world that the attacks in Paris on Charlie Hebdo and the kosher supermarket were just a Zionist plot. They claim that the motive for the attack on the kosher supermarket was to convince Jews to immigrate to Israel, to help Benjamin Netanyahu win the upcoming Israeli election. Iran's accomplice, Argentina's President Cristina Fernández Kirchner, tried the same tactic, hinting that the Jews were behind the recent murder of Alberto Nisman, the federal prosecutor who was about to testify how Argentina's leaders covered-up Iran's responsibility for the 1994 bombing of the Jewish community center (AMIA) in Buenos Aires.
There has also been collaboration between European governments and terrorist organizations in cynical deals, supposedly to prevent attacks on European soil. This collusion is most likely the reason France has refused to designate Hezbollah a terrorist organization for so long. It is also most likely the reason Hassan Nasrallah was so ridiculously quick to condemn the terrorist attacks in Paris, despite his relentless support for killing "infidels" and those who "disrespect" Islam. This list includes such international "criminals" as Salman Rushdie for his book, Satanic Verses; Anwar Sadat, who made peace with Israel, and Yasser Arafat for signing the Oslo Accords.
Another suspicious example of "cozy" international relations is the "temporary" EU removal of Hamas from its list of designated terrorist groups, despite it being crystal-clear that Hamas is devastating its own people as well as the Palestinian Authority and Israel, and that it never misses a chance to sabotage any attempt to reach a peace agreement.
What is not clear so far is what France and the rest of Europe will receive in return for their stupidity, apart -- as we keep seeing -- from the perpetually broken promise of "no further attacks."
Europe, hedonist and dishonest, is apparently willing to cut a deal with any violent dictator, including the most potentially violent: a nuclear-threshold Iran.
Today's apologists for terrorist organizations are tomorrow's victims.

Bassam Tawil is a scholar based in the Middle East.

ISIS Leader Admits: We Are Being Funded By The Obama Administration

Shoebat

An ISIS leader named Yousef al-Salafi in Pakistan has admitted that ISIS is being funded by the USA, and thus, the Obama administration. This came from a statement done by the Pakistani government which interrogated Yousef and received this information from him.  
There was a news report done on this:

A source privy to the investigations said:

During the investigations, Yousaf al Salafi revealed that he was getting funding – routed through America – to run the organisation in Pakistan and recruit young people to fight in Syria

One source said that al Salafi confessed that he and another ally — said to be an imam — was getting paid by the US to recruit youths to join ISIS for $600 a recruit.
The same source said:

The US has been condemning the IS activities but unfortunately has not been able to stop funding of these organisations, which is being routed through the US… The US had to dispel the impression that it is financing the group for its own interests and that is why it launched offensive against the organisation in Iraq but not in Syria

The Obama administration funding ISIS should not surprise us. Lets not forget that the Obama administration has refused to back Egypt in its destruction of ISIS, and is working with Turkey which one of the main backers of ISIS. Let us also not forget that the USA supports the FSA and is working to continue to fund and train jihadists in Syria to overthrow the Assad regimen, an action that will only allow the Islamists, and ultimately Turkey, to dominate the Middle East.
The world truly is ruled by the devil, and all of his demons are possessing the most powerful people in the world, and while they make us think that they are doing the “right thing,” they are in reality supporting the epitome of all evil. From psychiatric drugs, Islamic terrorists, the slaughter of innocent infants, to the homosexual agenda, the evils that we see in front of our eyes are being empowered wicked men, embellished with suites and smiles.
We think the Islamic terrorists are the only evil, but the truth remains that the most demonic people are the ones behind the curtain of destruction, directing the scenes of perdition, while going before cameras with sharp grins, hand waves, and a lofty podium, and they are in power only because the masses allow them to be in power.
Let us always keep in mind that it was George Bush who removed Saddam, who was suppressing the jihadists and protecting the Christians, and all that did was set the stage for all of these Islamists to invade the Middle East, and from such chaos and disorder, ISIS was formed.
The fact remains that America is aiding the persecution of Christians in the Middle East, because at the end of the day, that is the ultimate goal of the jihadists: destroy Christianity.
This ISIS commander was in Pakistan, which means he was working to form a full sharia state in that country, which would only lead to a systematic slaughter of the Christian population.

Historian Takes Apart Obama’s Claim: ‘Islam Has Been Woven Into the Fabric of Our Country Since Its Founding’

Historian and Wallbuilders founder David Barton speaks on The Glenn Beck Program November 4, 2014. (File photo: TheBlaze TV)

Blaze

After President Barack Obama said this week that “Islam has been woven into the fabric of our country since its founding,” Glenn Beck asked historian David Barton to come on his radio program and share some examples of what the president meant.
“In all the reading I’ve done, thousands of books, there’s nothing there,” Barton said on Friday. “I mean, we know that Muslims were the folks who captured the slaves sent to America, largely out of Africa. … The Muslims did the slave hunting and the slave trading, et cetera. The first Muslims came to America as a result of the Muslims capturing them and sending them to the Dutch traders.”
Barton said that beyond their heavy involvement in the slave trade, America was at war with the Barbary pirates shortly after the founding of the country, but those were “the two biggest contributions.”
“This is the fabric,” Beck said with heavy sarcasm. “I mean, it’s practically the whole blanket.” 
Barton added that there were a number of Muslims whose activities were recorded in the 1800′s, but it might be a stretch to say they are part of the “fabric of the country.” One such Muslim helped the American military raise camels, he said.
“In 1856 the American military is engaged in all sorts of Indian wars in western lands,” Barton explained. “The secretary of war at that time was Jefferson Davis. Five years later, he would become part of the secession and the president of the Confederacy. But at that time, he’s secretary of war. What they did was they hired a Muslim to raise camels in Arizona because the cavalry said, ‘You know, instead of using horses across the desert, let’s try these camels.’”
“It was a short-lived experiment, but I have to credit their technology,” Barton added. “If you’re going to be in the desert chasing folks, why not use the animals that will go for several days, rather than several hours? But they were just so slow, they couldn’t keep up with the Indians.”
Beck emphasized that the founding fathers preached tolerance for all religions, and Thomas Jefferson defended the rights of Muslims overseas. But he feels the president is “changing our history” by saying Islam has been “woven into the fabric of our country since its founding.”
“David, thank you very much for enlightening me on this,” Beck concluded. “If the president wants to extol those who were selling people into slavery … so be it.”

The True Power Behind Islam’s Perfect Storm

NationalPatriot
h/t Nena S. (thanks for all your great research!)

Fact: they who control the U.N. and they who control the White House control the world. 
And that fact is one of the reasons why Barack HUSSEIN Obama does not want to stop ISIS. Obama is well aware that while ISIS can build the caliphate by force ISIS lacks the capability to manage the affairs of a dictatorship, and know that the caliphate is nothing but a dictatorship in disguise…just as Islam is a political system in the guise of a religion.

A brutal and barbaric dictatorship such as the caliphate would have no interest in seeking recognition or legitimacy from the United Nations nor from any of its members, however, control of the United Nations and one of its most influential and powerful members would indeed fit their agenda. Enter center stage Barack HUSSEIN Obama and the United States of America which, we believe, his intention is to make the 58th Islamic state.

And how would he do this…know that when this, his last term as president is up, Barack HUSSEIN Obama will NOT ‘fade away’ as some presidents do for his entire presidency has been orchestrated as a stepping stone to bigger things…to bigger things involving the one-world government of the caliphate. And he intends, we believe, to do this by using the U.N. to reach that goal.

But to use the U.N. Obama needs someone by his side who can craft deals, manipulate heads of state, and who can lie and cheat with abandon, and who can cavalierly throw aside those who get in the way of the ultimate goal. And one person alone comes to mind…Obama’s puppet master…Iranian born, Muslim Brotherhood supporter, and Iranian.com’s ‘person of the day’…

Valerie Jarrett.

Valerie Jarrett…the woman who has been at Obama’s side since his Chicago days as a Community Organizer…the woman who sits in on National Security Council, economic, budget, and foreign policy meetings…the woman who routinely meets with Muslim and Arab-American advocates and leaders behind closed doors at the White House and discusses internal policy, health care legislation, foreign policy, the economy, immigration, and national security with them…the woman who advises Obama about how to decide policy…that woman will be with Obama as he works his way into a top U.N. position and once there Jarrett will again pull his strings this time to assure the caliphate not only is in place but to assure its spread throughout the world.

Also, remember that it was Valerie Jarrett who Obama sent to Bahrain to hold secret talks with representatives of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s government for a year before the formal Iranian nuclear disarmament negotiations in Geneva even began.

As aligned with ISIS and islam as is Obama…maybe even more so…Valerie Jarrett is the reason why ISIS has not yet committed its atrocities here on American soil nor will they, we believe, until a new Republican president is in office. ISIS needs these two…needs Jarrett to manipulate Obama to do their bidding…to help them work their way into the U.N. via the office of the U.S. presidency.

2016 will be the deciding factor as to whether ISIS comes to America or not…and why…because if Hillary does become president she would have the protection of Huma Abedin the same way that Valerie Jarrett protects Obama. Remember, Abedin is directly connected to the Muslim Brotherhood through her mother, a member of the Muslim Sisterhood which is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, and thus can be controlled to do Islam’s bidding through that connection. Not only would Hillary be protected through Abedin but both would, we believe, be assured a position in the caliphate through that very connection. And while Islam usually does not have women hold positions of power they would do so in this case because these women would be puppets of those actually pulling the strings…pulling the stings and controlling America in the process.

Huma Abedin who, while working as Hillary Clinton’s confidant of sorts also held a side job, as former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy stated, “Abedin worked for many years at a journal that promotes Islamic supremacist ideology that was founded by a top al-Qaida financier, Abdullah Omar Naseef,” holding that position from 1996 through 2003. The journal of jihad Abedin worked for..’Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs’…was originally edited by Sayed Abedin, Huma Abedin’s father and is now edited by Saleha Abedin…Huma Abedin’s mother who is also deeply connected to an organization called the ‘Islamic Committee for Woman and Child.’ This committee is headed up by Sheikh Yusef al-Qaradawa…a well known Muslim Brotherhood jurist who routinely issues fatwas calling for the murders of American military and American private contractor personnel along with advocating homicide bombings inside Israel.

It is not difficult to connect the dots and understand why Huma Abedin, with her Islamic and Muslim Brotherhood connections, along with her intimate knowledge of Hillary Clinton’s and the United States policy agenda, would play a key role in controlling the White House in a Hillary Clinton presidency just as Valerie Jarrett has during the Obama presidency.

Remember back to 2007 when during his presidential campaign Obama said, “The day I’m inaugurated, not only the country looks at itself differently, but the world looks at America differently… If I’m reaching out to the Muslim world they understand that I’ve lived in a Muslim country and I may be a Christian, but I also understand their point of view…And so I’m intimately concerned with what happens in these countries and the cultures and perspective these folks have. And those are powerful tools for us to be able to reach out to the world…I think the world will have confidence that I am listening to them and that our future and our security is tied up with our ability to work with other countries in the world that will ultimately make us safer.”

We believe this was a pre-ordained statement in that, should he be elected president, and with Valerie Jarrett being his Islamic puppet master, Islam would maintain a hands-off policy when it came to jihad on American soil. As long as Obama danced to the Islamic music via the pipeline of Jarrett, America would remain safe as it were.

We also believe this to be the case should Hillary Clinton win in 2016 via the Huma Abedin pipeline in as much as should Hillary, like Obama, dance when her puppet strings are pulled by Islam, jihad would remain over there rather than coming over here.

Now consider this…should Obama move on to a plum job or position within the United Nations, and knowing that Jarrett would come along with him to continue to pull his strings at the whim of Islam, and should Hillary Clinton become the 45th president with Huma Abedin at her side, Islam will pull her strings as well…and the caliphate as built by the savage and barbaric tactics of ISIS, and managed as a dictatorship by the Muslim Brotherhood, would hold positions of immense power controlling policy as set by both the United Nations and the White House…a dire proposition to be sure.

And remember, Valerie Jarrett, the woman who when addressing students at Stanford University in 1977 said, “I am an Iranian by birth and of my Islamic faith. I am also an American Citizen and I seek to help change America to be a more Islamic country. My faith guides me and I feel like it is going well in the transition of using freedom of religion in America against itself”, proved all those many years ago to be aligned against America.

The long and short of this scenario is as follows…as long as any American president remains pro-Islam while turning their backs on our allies this assures the caliphate will be built…swallowing up and/or destroying afore mentioned allies in the Middle East, and allowing for the possibility of the caliphate having nuclear weapons at their disposal. Thus, Americans will remain safe from the horrors of Islam on our own soil. But should we elect a Republican president in 2016, one who is willing to go to war to protect our interests and allies in that region, all bets are off and the next 9/11 will be launched against the United States post-haste.

The linchpins in all of this are Abedin and Jarrett but why would Islam, well known for relegating females to a position of nothing more than chattel invest so much power in these two women? To connect those dots, we must step back and examine the relationship that started it all in the Muslim world…Muhammad and his child bride Aisha.

Valerie Jarrett’s relationship to Obama can be compared to Aisha’s relationship to Muhammad not in a husband and wife sense but comparing each as the Svengali to the other. Aisha played a critical role in the emergence of Islam including in its evolution of social reform. Not only was she supportive of Muhammad, but she contributed to the development of Islam itself. Given the title ‘al-Siddiqah,’ meaning ‘the one who affirms the truth’ Aisha was known for her knowledge of the qur’an and Arab history. In fact, her contributions regarding the verbal texts of Islam were transcribed into written form and became the ‘official’ history of Islam. After Muhammad’s death, Aisha was regarded as the most reliable source in the teachings of the hadith as she was often looked upon to settle disputes on ‘demeanor’ and various points of law.

In other words, just like Valerie Jarrett, Aisha was a policymaker.

As for Valerie Jarrett’s relationship with Obama, like Aisha, Jarrett continues to play a critical role in shaping both Obama’s foreign and domestic policies. Working not only for social change, just like Aisha, Jarrett has actually dictated to Obama what his policies on immigration and health care would be as well as directing him to give positions of power within our government to Muslim Brotherhood operatives, earning her the nickname of ‘puppet master’ and ‘the woman who runs the White House.’ And while Obama pretends to be his own man it is Valerie Jarrett who set’s up his schedules, decides who he is to meet with or not meet with, and who for all intents and purposes never leaves his side.

As for Hillary Clinton’s relationship to Huma Abedin, their ties are personal as well as political but it’s the political that is of concern, because the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence as passed along through Huma Abedin can clearly be seen in U.S. foreign policy decisions made by Hillary in her capacity as Secretary of State. Remember, Hillary was the woman who allowed the enemy…the 17th February Brigade…an offshoot of Ansar al-Sharia…to guard our Benghazi Compound and who recently said that we must show more empathy for the enemy. Hillary, also know as an apologist just like her boss Obama, apologized directly to the Muslim Brotherhood for the YouTube video she and the administration tried to claim was the catalyst for the Benghazi attacks. And let’s never forget her infamous words,“what difference does it make” in regards to the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods.

But as critical as the Obama/Jarrett and Clinton/Abedin connections are even more so is the fact that Islam’s modern-day Aisha-policymakers…both of whom know their bosses deepest personal and political secrets…are poised to assume power positions within both the United Nations and the White House even as Hamas and Hezbolla begin to coalesce into a united front of Islamic power in the Middle East.

With the relationship between Hezbollah and Hamas most definitely warming up based upon their mutual hatred of Israel and despite their differences over Syria, both remain united in their goal of seeing Israel fall and being replaced by the Palestinian Authority which is loyal to Hamas. Both Hezbollah and Hamas are puppet elements of two bigger dots that need to be connected…the first being that Hamas is the Muslim Brotherhood…the second being that Hezbollah is Iran. And once these two factions permanently unite…and that time is fast approaching…Israel will face major problems as will their new ally Egypt…an Arab country who has outwardly set themselves against the Islamists…who will now face both factions as they actively work to remove Egyptian President el-Sisi from office in retaliation for his overthrow of the Muslim Brotherhood’s puppet President Mohamed Morsi.

An even more dire element to this part of the picture is Obama’s insistence in cutting a deal with Iran…a deal that will allow Iran to build nuclear weapons.

An integral component of the big picture is the Muslim Brotherhood, more palatable to the Arab nations yet Islamists in their own right. Once the army of ISIS has the caliphate in place circumstances will afford the Muslim Brotherhood the opportunity to become the defacto dictatorship of the caliphate. Remember, the Muslim Brotherhood is a well organized political entity whose presence in the Middle East has been in place for almost a century leaving them the logical choice for running ‘the business’ of the caliphate, while ISIS would become to the caliphate what the Gestapo was to the Third Reich.

Connect the dots…once the vacuum of power is created by the fall of Egypt and the Islamic hoped-for destruction of Israel…and once the Muslim Brotherhood is outwardly allied with Iran…and once Iran is under the protection of an Obama engineered deal…a deal as with ‘his pen and his phone’ rather than a treaty which would require Senate confirmation…the defacto dictatorship of the caliphate would then be in possession of nuclear weapons.

Let us be crystal clear on this point…we believe that the ultimate goal is not just to allow Iran to have nuclear weapons capability, but to make nuclear weapons accessible to the whole of the caliphate with delivery systems that could not only threaten the Middle East and our allies, but delivery systems that could reach Europe, the UK, and even the United States.

After connecting the individual dots to see the total picture as to where this current regime and a possible Hillary Clinton regime would take us regarding the caliphate, our allies in the Middle East, and America’s future both on the world stage and here at home, it becomes apparent that the only way to stop what is now shaping up as a destiny none can afford is to elect a Republican president who would employ military might against the forces of barbaric savagery…against Obama’s brethren.