Eight weeks ago Obama moved to "weaponize" the IRS, despite the still growing scandal of targeting conservative groups it is already involved with.  The new IRS regulations, if implemented would:  

"unconstitutionally compel a 90-day blackout period during election years in which conservative 501(c)(4) organizations – such as tea-party, pro-life and pro-family groups – would be banned from mentioning the name of any candidate for office, or even the name of any political party.
Here’s the kicker: As you may have guessed, liberal lobbying groups like labor unions and trade associations are deliberately exempted."

Last month, a day before Christmas break, Congress passed the latest and strongest version of the National Defense and Authorization Act yet. 

On Wednesday Obama spoke to his fellow Progressives (sending his dictatorial message to his opponents on Capitol Hill and We The People) announcing that he will continue to subvert the constitution by acting unilaterally when it comes to his radical agenda, telling Senate Democrats he plans to use his executive authority to act in 2014 when Congress stands in his way. 

The reaction by Congress to his illegal subversion?  Still waiting for that one.

On Friday, he announced in a speech that the NSA will continue to spy on his enemies, I mean, the American people (in order to get the bad guys of course). 

Notice a pattern?

I think we are supposed to feel reassured that when they spy on us it is done “responsibly”.  You know, responsibly like the Fast and Furious program.  That went well.  Or responsibly like the trillion dollar socialist giveaway program called the stimulus package-we still don't know, and never will, where all that money went. Or responsibly like the roll out of Obamacare.  
Yes, we can certainly trust the good folks in the Federal Government to act responsibly on behalf of Americans- because...well, because Obama says so. 
And this is just a smattering, a small sample of what is going on in your America.  
Thank God there are still many concerned citizens to pray and take action against our now lawless nation. But we must make haste, because the enemy in our midst is moving "FORWARD" with more tyranny, full steam.

- W.E.


The White House promised Friday that it was ending the NSA's most controversial surveillance program "as it currently exists." 
But make no mistake, it's still going to exist.

In fact, what President Obama has announced will have little operational effect on the National Security Agency's collection of Americans' data. And, significantly, the administration has attempted to dodge some of the biggest decisions, passing the ball to Congress, which will likely do nothing if recent trends hold.
Much of the attention in the run-up to the speech involved the NSA's retention and search of so-called metadata—calling records, including calls made by U.S. citizens, that help the government identify potential terrorist relationships. And the president didn't come close to what privacy advocates have wanted—a sharp culling of the program or its outright termination.
Instead, the goal of Friday's announcement —as it has always been—was to reassure a skittish public both here and abroad that the program is being used responsibly. "This is a capability that needs to be preserved," a senior administration official said. 

After Friday, keep in mind how the status quo has, or has not, been altered:

1) The phone metadata still exists.
2) It will be kept, at least in the short-term, by the government until Congress figures out what to do with it. (And don't think the telecom lobby won't play a role in that.)
3) It will be searched.
4) Searches will be approved by a court with a record of being friendly to the government, one without a new privacy advocate.
5) National security letters can still be issued by the FBI without a court order.
6) Much of this activity will remain secret.
The president made two major policy prescriptions. First, he called for the data to be housed somewhere other than within the government. Second, he said before the NSA can search the calling-record database, it should obtain judicial approval.
To the first, the president would not specify where the data will be ultimately stored. He wants the Justice Department and the intelligence community to come up with a proposal within 60 days. The administration is reluctant to force telecom providers to house the data, both because of logistical problems and because the industry wants nothing to do with it. Some have suggested creating a private consortium, but that will take time. And if it proves that there is no better place to keep the data, it well could remain with the U.S. government. (Sounds a little like GITMO.)
To the second of Obama's measures, judicial oversight will come in the form of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which critics say acts as a rubber stamp for government surveillance requests, rather than by more independent-minded federal judges on other courts. The Wall Street Journal last year estimated the Court rejects less than 1 percent of all requests; the chief judge has maintained that it sends back up to 25 percent. Either way, the overwhelming majority of requests are granted unimpeded, particularly when the requests are time-sensitive.

Tellingly, the president rejected a recommendation from an outside panel to establish a "public advocate" inside the Court to represent privacy interests. Instead, he wants an outside group of experts to consult on cutting-edge legal matters, not on day-to-day surveillance requests.
Yes, the FISA review adds an extra step to the process (one that may frustrate counterterror hawks), but it likely will do little to restrain the NSA. (The president is taking one concrete step, limiting searches to two "hops" away from a subject's phone number, not three.)
The president also rejected a recommendation that the so-called national security letters used by the FBI to obtain business records from investigation targets be subject to judicial approval, after the bureau objected to the idea.
Most important, many of the recommendations the president made Friday are perishable. Ultimately Congress will have to determine the data-collection and storage issues and other major elements of the program, including the procedures of the FISA court, when it reauthorizes the NSA program this spring at the end of the 60-day window outlined by the president.
And it's possible Congress could choose to keep it in its current form, officials concede.
Senior administration officials maintain that none of these surveillance programs have been abused—and that they remain a valuable tool in combating national security threats (despite little evidence the metadata program has played a direct role in foiling an attack). It's why President Obama was quick to mention the 9/11 attacks in his remarks Friday. And it's why, in his mind, reform could really only go so far.
As it turned it, it wasn't very far at all.