In her snarky column last week, Ann Coulter wrote:
It's as if Cruz and Trump are playing different sports: Trump keeps belting home runs, while Cruz is berating the umpire until he calls a balk, then prances to home base, telling everyone he hit a grand slam.And I suppose there are no "rules" that disallow party leaders too crush the right of people to vote.
I keep asking someone to send me a copy of THE RULES that direct state parties to ignore the voters and pick their own slate of delegates, but no one can cite such a rule. So I read through "The Rules of the Republican Party" myself -- and guess what? There's no rule instructing state parties to ignore the voters!
To the contrary, the rules were recently rewritten so that delegate selection would "reflect the results of statewide presidential preference elections," according to a statement by Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus. (The nerds will tell us, that's "legislative history," not THE RULES.)
True, there's no rule explicitly disallowing a state party from rigging the delegate selection. There's also no rule explicitly disallowing a state party from giving all its delegates to Kim Kardashian.
Just like in the Soviet Union.
Social media posts, along with Cruz’s campaign website, reveal thatsupporters in the Colorado Republican Party were responsible for crushing an effort to give Colorado the ability to vote in a state primary.
In May of 2015, four Colorado Senate Republicans killed an initiative “to create a presidential primary in 2016,” reported the Denver Post. “Under the bill, Colorado would have held a presidential primary in March that ran parallel with the state’s complicated caucus system… when it came before the Senate Appropriations Committee, four Republicans voted to kill the bill with three Democrats supporting it.”
The four Republicans who voted against the initiative were Sen. Kevin Grantham, Sen. Kent Lambert, Sen. Laura Woods, and Sen. Jerry Sonnenberg.
On Cruz’s campaign website, Sens. Woods, Grantham, and Lambert are all listed as Cruz supporters and as declared members of Cruz’s “Colorado Leadership team.”
“I am honored to have the support of so many courageous conservatives in Colorado,” Cruz said about his so-called leadership team in early April. “With our incredible team we are in a very strong position for this weekend’s assemblies in Colorado.”
Sen. Grantham is even an official Cruz delegate and Sen. Lambert is an alternate Cruz delegate.
At the time, the editors of the Denver Post seemed perplexed by Grantham’s decision not to support the primary election initiative. In a May 2015 editorial titled, “Colorado GOP flubs chance for 2016 presidential primary,” the editors write: “What? Grantham was a sponsor of the bill. If he thought the bill made enough sense to put his name on it, why wouldn’t he think it should be passed out of committee?”
The editors go on to suggest that Party leaders may have had “other agendas that remain undisclosed” for rejecting a primary election of the people. The editors write: an “opportunity to move Colorado out of its antiquated presidential caucuses has been lost through miscommunication, timidity or, perhaps, because of other agendas that remain undisclosed.” They continue, “The caucuses guarantee lackluster voter participation and the disproportionate influence of activists on both ends of the political spectrum who are not representative of the parties’ mainstream. Some romanticize the caucus system as the purest form of grass-roots democracy, but that’s only accurate if your idea of democracy involves excruciatingly low turnout — by design.”
Following Cruz’s “voterless victory,” the state senators who had killed the primary election initiative seemed effusive.
Sen. Grantham tweeted:
#Cruz2016 completes the Colorado sweep!— Kevin Grantham (@SenatorGrantham) April 10, 2016
I am officially a delegate to the #RNC2016 in Cleveland!— Kevin Grantham (@SenatorGrantham) April 10, 2016
Sen. Woods tweeted:
Sen. Jerry Sonnenberg, who — unlike the others — is not listed as a member of the Cruz’s “Leadership team” tweeted:
Ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce you to the guy who cleaned up on GOP delegates @tedcruz #copolitics pic.twitter.com/jm8lBInPm8— Jerry Sonnenberg (@JerrySonnenberg) April 9, 2016
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed last week, Trump addressed the Colorado controversy. Trump said that delegates are “supposed to reflect the decisions of voters.” Indeed, for many years now, delegates have largely been seen as an honorary position for Party loyalists and household names in local districts. Yet in recent months, there has been increasing discussion about serious efforts to recruit “Trojan horse delegates,” who would cast off their honorary titles and actually choose a nominee based on their own personal whims.
In his column, Donald Trump addressed these “double-agent delegates who reject the decision of voters” and tied Cruz to the growing controversy over a delegate selection and convention procedure that operates completely independent from the actual Republican electorate:
No one forced anyone to cancel the vote in Colorado. Political insiders made a choice to cancel it. And it was the wrong choice. Responsible leaders should be shocked by the idea that party officials can simply cancel elections in America if they don’t like what the voters may decide… Mr. Cruz has toured the country bragging about his voterless victory in Colorado. For a man who styles himself as a warrior against the establishment (you wouldn’t know it from his list of donors and endorsers), you’d think he would be demanding a vote for Coloradans. Instead, Mr. Cruz is celebrating their disenfranchisement… Mr. Cruz has no democratic path to the nomination. He has been mathematically eliminated by the voters… Voter disenfranchisement is not merely part of the Cruz strategy—it is the Cruz strategy… My campaign strategy is to win with the voters. Ted Cruz’s campaign strategy is to win despite them.